Journal

Journal

0l6a9106

The House With No Locks 

Parenting is often described as building a home, walls of routine, doors of safety, windows of hope. But when you are parenting a child with profound needs, the house you build has no locks. Not because you forgot them, but because the storms come from inside. I did not become a mother expecting to learn the language of restraint holds, safety plans, and crisis calls. I did not imagine that love could coexist with fear so intimately that they would share the same breath. Yet this is the landscape of parenting a child whose nervous system is at war with itself; whose body moves faster than reason, whose impulses arrive without permission, whose needs spill beyond the edges of ordinary care. My child is not cruel. He is not bad. He is a wildfire born in drought, dangerous not by intention, but by conditions beyond his choosing. There were days when I stood between him and the world like a levee, absorbing the flood so no one else would be harmed. Days when my arms were bruised not from anger, but from proximity. Nights when I slept lightly, listening not for nightmares but for footsteps because elopement is a quiet thing, a child slipping into danger while the house exhales. I learned that safety is not peace; it is vigilance. It is being on watch even while loving fiercely. The hardest truths were the ones that did not come with villains. Inappropriate sexual behaviors are not confessions of character; they are symptoms of unmet regulation, misfiring boundaries, developmental fractures that words cannot mend. Still, knowing this does not erase the weight of it. It does not make it easier to protect other children, to safeguard dignity, to carry the shame that society so eagerly assigns to mothers who cannot “control” what was never within their control to begin with. A truth that I still struggle to accept, however at the same time I believe has softened me, cradled me through this journey.  I lived inside a paradox: to love my child was to limit him. To protect him was to protect others from him. To mother him was to accept that my presence alone was no longer enough, to mother the other children I had to accept I wasn’t enough for him.  There is a mythology in parenting that says love is always sufficient. That if you just stay, just try harder, just sacrifice more, the child will be healed by proximity. But love is not a sedative. It does not rewire a brain. It does not erase trauma, neurodivergence, or impulse dysregulation. Love is not a shield against physics. And so I faced the most violent grief of all: choosing separation not because I wanted relief, but because I wanted survival, my other children needed survival.  Placing my child into CPS custody was not abandonment. It was a handing over of the map when the terrain exceeded my tools. It was saying, I cannot be the only adult between him and catastrophe anymore. It was acknowledging that my love, while endless, was not equipped to be a locked door, a full clinical team, a secure perimeter. People imagine CPS as a cliff. For me, it was a bridge made of splinters; every step painful, every step uncertain, but the only crossing available. I did not walk away; I stood shaking on the edge and asked for help in a world that often punishes mothers for needing it and to this day it still feels like punishment for asking, really I had to beg.  There is a particular loneliness in parenting a child who cannot safely remain in your home. It is the loneliness of still being a mother without the rituals that prove it to others. No bedtime stories. No scraped knees to kiss. Just advocacy meetings, documentation, and the ache of loving someone you cannot hold without risk. Yet even here, love persists; not as possession, but as stewardship. I love my child enough to release him into structures stronger than my arms. Enough to choose long-term safety over short-term closeness. Enough to grieve the parenting I imagined while still honoring the one I lived. Parenting a special needs child like mine is not a journey up a mountain; it is standing in the ocean, bracing against waves you cannot stop, learning when to hold and when to let the current take over before you both drown. I am still his mother. Not because he lives with me, but because I chose his life over my pride, his safety over my fear of judgment, his future over the illusion that love alone could fix what required an entire system. This is not a story of failure. It is a story of triage. Of choosing the least destructive fire. Of loving so deeply that you are willing to be misunderstood forever. And if there is grace in this story, it lives here:I did not stop loving my child when I let go.I let go because I loved him.


 “Lantern Bones”

I carry a lantern made of bone,
stitched with shadows,
lit by the fragments
of who I used to be.

The night is thick with silence,
not absence,
but the kind that hums
with unanswered questions.

I walk through old rooms
of my memory
,where echoes sit in corners
like forgotten prayers.

I trace the outline
of someone I almost became
a flicker in the fog,
a breath I didn’t take.

If I find her,
will she recognize me?
Will we speak in mirrors,
or mourn what was lost
between becoming and survival?

I do not know.
Still,
I wander.
Lantern held high.
Looking.

This poem mirrors Emily Dickinson’s line-"I am out with Lanterns, Looking for myself"-by portraying a solitary, introspective journey. The “lantern made of bone” symbolizes a search lit by pain and past experiences. I navigate memory and identity, questioning whether their past and present selves can still connect. It’s a meditation on self-discovery shaped by loss, survival, and the quiet resilience of continuing the search, even when uncertain of what will be found.